🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial policy to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and families are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of countries are exploring similar measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". The policy could be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban remains "an tools on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked the legislature to enact a bill increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has suggested a related move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged guardians to block their children from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding motion demanding a ban for minors without parental consent is granted. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the step does not create binding law.

"A clear age barrier is a good starting point," commented a leading MEP supporting the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "based on strong data".

Previously, support gathered behind a proposal to impose controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the government pledged to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. One foundation established by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after encountering dangerous platform posts suggests that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to design products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," commented a influential child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

In the United States, regulation is mostly unfolding at the regional level due to national gridlock.

• Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure banning children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a rule restricting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with extra time dependent on parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted measures mandating guardian approval for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from some individuals to copy the Australian path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Views

Beyond the West, other states are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, world agencies take a more cautious stance. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The body points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve user protection.

While this worldwide debate evolves, the actions of this nation and others show that policymakers globally are increasingly prepared to wait for platforms to act voluntarily.