🔗 Share this article

Last year, actor Jude Law remarked he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for playing Vladimir Putin in a new film. The movie, however, may align so closely with the carefully constructed version promoted by official channels that, within Russia, it functions as a compliment instead of a critique.

The Crafted Strongman

For years, the Russian political apparatus and its pop-culture machine have collaborated to craft a tailor-made persona of the president. This figure is an infallible strategist without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reframed as a local 007 who always knows beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long eclipsed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a television show released last October, helmed by a Kremlin supporter. The protagonist is a fictional security officer selected by fate to “rescue” Russia from chaos. Although the character's name a different name, the implication is clear: the hero must be a familiar security officer.

Western portrayals frequently result in reinforcing this identical story rather than undercutting it. A new film inspired by a bestselling satirical novel aims to undermine the leader's mythology by framing him as a symptom but as a symptom, moving the focus to the spin doctors around him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

In the film, the president is shown as having been picked by influential figures to stabilise the nation because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. They visit him and practically plead him to take the top job. He replies is that he would rather govern from the shadows, desiring permanent power.

This tale is a key piece of state propaganda: the detached, unwilling mastermind shaped by destiny. In reality, these events took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody actually pleaded with Putin to accept the role. The position was effectively a casting call with no shortage of contenders. At the centre to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the country de facto.

• His list featured various figures, among them a reformer later murdered and a former spy chief.
• Per an expert who researched Putin’s biography, the future president merely met the required parameters: obedient, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer close to the events stated the key criterion was manageability and faithfulness, not strength.

“They didn’t need a strong candidate, they needed someone malleable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Analysts concur that the image of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was built after the fact. Claims about his clandestine activities in Dresden fall apart under examination. Fundamentally, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a mid-level functionary not engaged in field operations.

Curiously, the shift to framing him as a “007” may in part have been triggered by the actor's debut as 007. The grittier version prompted Russian media and social media to draw visual parallels with their leader. Edited images replacing Craig’s face with his appeared on city centers, fueling the growing tendency to see him as a Russian 007.

A Propaganda Win?

With Jude Law, an star popular with Russian audiences, the Kremlin are likely to seize the opportunity to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's exclusion of public dissent, the political rivals, or key figures from its narrative, even though it includes the past decade, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, Putin is often an omnipotent figure who never appears directly. His influence is signaled through photographs or calls “from above”. In this new film, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that may inadvertently validate the exact legends it perhaps aims to question.